FOR MEDIA REQUESTS AND INTERVIEWS,

please contact the Constitution Party Media Relations Office at commsdirector@constitutionparty.com

STYLE GUIDE NOTE: When reporting about the Constitution Party, please use the name “Constitution Party” in the first instance.  The abbreviation “CP” may be used thereafter.  Also when noting the affiliation of candidates, please refer to them as “Constitution Party members.”


Media Releases

Constitution Party: No More Meddling in the Middle East

Karen Murray : October 23, 2013 11:07 am : Home, Media Releases
No Syria

CONSTITUTION PARTY: NO MORE MEDDLING IN THE MIDDLE EAST

23 October 2013

Military intervention in Syrian civil war is unconstitutional and unwise

The Constitution Party platform opposes interventionism, and even saber rattling, unless the vital interests of the nation are at risk—and the House of Representatives authorizes military action. Our plank on foreign policy demands that Congress, “refuse to fund unconstitutional, undeclared wars pursuant to presidential whim or international obligations under which American sovereignty has been transferred to multi-national agencies.”

Whether it is full scale military invasion of Iraq in 1990 or what the Pentagon now calls “limited stand-off strikes” in Syria, the Constitution Party takes seriously John Quincy Adams’ observation: “America abstain(s) from interference in the concerns of others, even when the conflict has been for principles to which she clings … She goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy.” The Constitution Party opposes war by Executive Order as well. The U.S. Constitution is clear: only Congress has the power to “define and punish … offenses against the Law of Nations” (Art. 1, § 8, cl.10). Congress cannot transfer to the president its exclusive power to declare war any more than it can transfer its exclusive power to levy taxes. Such a transfer is illegal.

Intervention in the tragic Syrian civil war is not only unconstitutional, it is a risky strategy. A May 5 Reuters News Service story proves the point: “U.N. investigator: testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas.” Dropping American bombs into this complex, confusing, and far away fight will only fortify terrorist rallying cries and further erode the historic U.S. foreign policy based on fairness, justice, and guided by a moral compass. The American people understand this and are resisting the machinations of the military-industrial complex. Polls consistently show 65-75 percent opposition to meddling in the Middle East. The Constitution Party urges voters to reject U.S. jingoism and heed Thomas Jefferson’s sage foreign policy advice: “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.”

 


Comments are closed
« Page 1, 2»

 

 


FACTS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION PARTY

In 1992 a coalition of independent state parties united to form the U.S. Taxpayers Party at its first national convention in New Orleans, Louisiana.  Among the notable convention speakers was former Congressman Ron Paul. The party’s founder, Howard Phillips of Virginia, Chairman of the grass-roots lobby, the Conservative Caucus, was nominated to be the party’s first candidate for President with retired Army Brigadier General Albion Knight of Maryland nominated as the party’s first vice-presidential running mate. The US Taxpayer’s Party secured ballot position in 21 states.  Later, in 1999, the name was changed to the Constitution Party to better reflect the party’s primary focus of re-establishing the American Constitutional Republic according to the Actual Intent of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE COMPLETE HISTORY OF THE CONSTITUTION PARTY

 

CANDIDATES

Constitution Party candidates were elected to partisan offices for the first time in 2006, including Montana State Representative Rick Jore.  Many Constitution Party supporters hold local non-partisan offices across America, including Alaska and Pennsylvania, among others.

 

PLATFORM

The Constitution Party is the only party which is completely:

  • Pro-Life
  • Pro-States’ Rights
  • Pro-Second Amendment
  • Pro-Constitutional, Limited Government
  • Against- illegal immigration and amnesty
  • Against- U.S. policy being dictated by the United Nations and other globalist organizations
  • Against- undeclared unconstitutional wars (such as Iraq and Afghanistan)
  • Against- free trade and all international trade agreements such as NAFTA & GATT

READ MORE:      SEVEN PRINCIPLES         KEY ISSUES       2012-2016 PLATFORM and RESOLUTIONS

 

WHY A THIRD PARTY?

1. To encourage voter participation and citizen involvement in the governing process.

2. Competition yields a Superior Product; i.e. better elected officials and better government.

· 95% of all incumbent candidates win re-election. In recent years, between 50 and 75 of incumbent Congressmen in the U.S. did not face an opponent on the November ballot, allowing them to be reelected without even campaigning.

· Voter choice is even more limited in state legislative races. 35 to 40% of the 6900 seats in state houses across the US (over 2500 seats) typically have no competition.

3. To address issues ignored by the two parties in power.

 

PAST THIRD PARTIES CHAMPIONED…

· A Woman’s Right to Vote -introduced in 1872 by the Prohibition Party. It wasn’t until 1916 that the two political parties in power began to consider the issue.

· Abolition of Slavery-introduced by the Liberty Party (1840/1844) The issue was not fully accepted by the Republican Party even as late as 1860. The Republican Party was itself a third party in 1854 when it was founded. Just a few years later, the Republicans defeated the incumbent conservative party, the Whigs, by running a man named Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln, running in a four-way race, won the electoral college and the presidency even though he wasn’t on the ballot in nine states and received less that 40% of the popular vote.

· A Balanced Budget- focus of Independent/Reform Party (1992/1996) candidate Ross Perot who campaigned for fiscal restraint. By the time George W. Bush became president the budget was balanced. Today both parties give strong lip service to ending deficit spending though neither party is willing to make the tough political choices needed to balance the budget.

CLICK HERE TO READ “A BRIEF LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THIRD PARTIES IN AMERICA”